Better internet is coming, but Monterey residents need to act

Internet availability, or the lack thereof, has been a frequent topic of discussion and in many cases, angst, over the last decade.  Even with the AT&T cell tower offering interim relief, those of us who use it for data have seen a pronounced degradation over holiday weekends due peak demand.  Fortunately, there is progress being made.  For homes in New Marlborough, the town has entered into an agreement with Spectrum and work is underway. The targeted go live date is in the first half of 2021.

For residents on the other side of the lake in Monterey, the log jam between the State and Fiber Connect (FC) has been broken and the State will release about $1.1 million to FC to wire 96% of the town with fiber optic lines PROVIDED 51% of the Monterey households commit now.  Without that commitment, the State will not release the funding and FC will not move forward.  Furthermore, since FC has already wired a significant portion of Monterey, no other company will likely enter the market.

As of July, 2020 FC had received commitments from 39%.  If you are interested in true broadband and have not contacted FC about your interest, you may want to do so now. In addition, FC is offering some very attractive installation discounts if you commit now.

Even if you don’t see the need personally for broadband access,  it is fair to say your property values will be adversely impacted by the lack of broadband availability.

2 thoughts on “Better internet is coming, but Monterey residents need to act

  1. Chuck: I want internet as much as most, and I don’t profess to know every detail, but my recollection is that the fellow that owns this company came along a couple of years ago offering to wire only the most lucrative parts of Monterey (mostly Garfield and Buel) without any government subsidy. The result was that Wired West, and any other company trying go get last mile funding from the government to wire the entire town at lower rates, failed. Now, Fiber Connect, having run everyone else out of town, is trying to get government money yet still charge much higher fees. Seems unfair to me. I feel we have been hoodwinked. If I am wrong about this, please correct me.
    Given my part time use, a $1000 install fee, $100 a month, and a three year commitment for 12 months a year is too high a price to pay.

    • There is certainly a lot of history, including Wired West’s initial business model being rejected by the state, but the Massachusetts money is available to a group of underserved towns largely in western MA. Early participants include Comcast and Spectrum, but the State was concerned with a small local firm with limited track record. As a result, Monterey was more or less on the sidelines for the pass couple of years.

      Did Fiber Connect meet the Internet need for half the town several years ago? It did, without any government subsidy. Did that preclude other entrants? Probably. I don’t recall though that they ever made a claim of wiring the entire town. Perhaps they did. The government subsidy though does require that at least 96% of all households have access.

      I think you’ll find the installation fee if you sign up before the build out is $499 but check with FC. Regarding their monthly fee, it’s on par with what I’m paying in suburban Boston. Not cheap by any stretch of the imagination but so much of what we do nowadays requires internet access.

Leave a Reply - (Civility required :)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s